Kiryl Harbatsiuk vs Connor Farren Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Harbatsiuk vs Farren analysis and find out who is favored!
Kiryl Harbatsiuk vs Connor Farren Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Harbatsiuk 2 - 0 Farren
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Harbatsiuk has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Farren has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Harbatsiuk, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Farren has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Harbatsiuk has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Farren has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Harbatsiuk has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Farren winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Harbatsiuk has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 19/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 8/ 9). Farren has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 191/ 191), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 20% (W/L 2/ 8).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Harbatsiuk winning 2 times and Farren being victorious 0 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Harbatsiuk winning 4 and Farren winning 2. The last match between Harbatsiuk and Farren was at the Sacramento Challenger, 28-09-2013, Q1 round, Hard with Kiryl Harbatsiuk getting the victory 6-3 4-6 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:53:43.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Harbatsiuk and Farren have played a deciding set 2 times, with Harbatsiuk winning 2 times and Farren 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Harbatsiuk winning 0, and Farren 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Harbatsiuk has played against opponents with an average rank of while Farren has played against players with an average rank of 156.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Harbatsiuk has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Farren has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Harbatsiuk has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Farren has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Kiryl Harbatsiuk
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
High
36
Age
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
894
Rank
685
High
29
Age
R
Plays
Connor Farren
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
47% (27-30)
Career Total W/L
48% (200-214)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Harbatsiuk VS Farren H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Kiryl Harbatsiuk | Connor Farren |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
Sets Won | 4 | 2 |
Games Won | 34 | 24 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 4 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 0:53:43 | 0:53:43 |
1st Serve % | 53% (39/73) | 58% (50/86) |
1st Serve Win% | 74% (29/39) | 56% (28/50) |
2nd Serve Win% | 56% (19/34) | 50% (18/36) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 60% (3/5) |
Return Points W% | 47% (40/86) | 34% (25/73) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Harbatsiuk VS Farren H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 4-6 6-2 |
Kiryl Harbatsiuk
Player
Connor Farren
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
88
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
6-7(5) 6-4 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Kiryl Harbatsiuk | Connor Farren |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Kiryl Harbatsiuk Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Florian Lakat
Player
Kiryl Harbatsiuk
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
89%
(
16 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Dimitar Kutrovsky
Player
Kiryl Harbatsiuk
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Kiryl Harbatsiuk
Player
Dennis Zivkovic
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
69%
(
57 of
83)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Kiryl Harbatsiuk
Player
Connor Farren
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
88
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jesse Witten
Player
Kiryl Harbatsiuk
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Kiryl Harbatsiuk
Player
Chris Wettengel
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Kiryl Harbatsiuk
Player
Alexis Klegou
49%
(
32 of
65)
1st Serve %
49%
(
31 of
63)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 | 2-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 2-6 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Connor Farren Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Connor Farren
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Keegan Smith
Player
Connor Farren
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
47%
(
39 of
83)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Connor Farren
Player
Alexander Kotzen
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Connor Farren
Player
Braden Shick
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jaimee Floyd Angele
Player
Connor Farren
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Connor Farren
Player
Rudy Quan
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Facundo Mena
Player
Connor Farren
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
13
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Connor Farren
Player
Ivar Aramburu Contreras
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Facundo Mena
Player
Connor Farren
42%
(
19 of
45)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
11
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
100%
(
19 of
19)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
A.j. Catanzariti
Player
Connor Farren
69%
(
66 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
4
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more